Trump’s Proposal to Send National Guard to DC Draws Resident Backlash, Though Some Approve

Mixed Reactions in Washington as Trump Moves to Deploy National Guard

Trump Announces Federal Control Over D.C. Policing

President Donald Trump revealed new details Monday about his plan to take control of public safety in Washington, D.C., following a violent attack on a former Department of Government Efficiency staffer. The move includes activating the D.C. National Guard and assuming command of the Metropolitan Police Department — an idea he had floated since last week’s assault in the Logan Circle neighborhood.

Local Opposition to Federal Intervention

Many D.C. residents expressed frustration, calling the plan an overreach of federal authority. “D.C. politics should stay with D.C.,” one resident told Fox News Digital, warning that the federal government was “overstepping their bounds.” Others voiced concerns about the sight of troops on city streets, saying such measures undermine local self-governance.

Historical Context of Federalization

This isn’t the first time Trump has used federal authority over local National Guard forces. In June, he federalized California’s National Guard without Governor Gavin Newsom’s request during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles — the first such move in over six decades. That decision drew sharp criticism, and now similar tensions are surfacing in the nation’s capital.

Fear and Frustration Over Crime

While the Department of Justice reported a 30-year low in violent crime last year, many residents remain uneasy. Some believe crime is rising despite the statistics, pointing to alarming incidents in their neighborhoods. “The city is getting dangerous,” one resident said, adding she avoids being out after dark for fear of being robbed.

Support From Some Residents

Not everyone opposes Trump’s move. A number of residents say the city needs stronger measures to combat crime. “I think it’s a good idea… Right now, we’re not safe,” one supporter said. Another agreed, stressing the need for “all the protection we can get” as conditions feel increasingly unsafe.

Calls for Local Control and Reform

Others argue the issue lies within the Metropolitan Police Department and should be addressed locally rather than through federal intervention. Some residents advocate for D.C. statehood to give the district greater autonomy, insisting the city should not be subject to unilateral federal decisions on its policing.