In Texas, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman inspects a future mega data center—sprawling over land larger than Central Park and powered by its own natural gas plant. With a $60 billion budget, it’s designed to be one of the world’s most powerful A.I. hubs.
At the same time in Argentina, computer science professor Nicolás Wolovick runs one of his country’s most advanced A.I. setups from a repurposed classroom with aging chips and tangled cables. His view is blunt: “We are losing.”
The contrast captures a new digital divide—one no longer about internet access, but raw computing power, or “compute,” needed to train and deploy A.I. systems. This divide is redrawing geopolitical and economic lines, creating dependencies, and raising concerns over technological sovereignty.
According to Oxford researchers, just 32 countries (about 16% globally) host large-scale A.I. data centers. The U.S., China, and the EU dominate—with U.S. and Chinese firms operating over 90% of global A.I. infrastructure.
By contrast:
Africa and South America have little to no local compute capacity.
India and Japan host a few, but most countries have none.
A few U.S. firms—Amazon, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI—spend more on A.I. infrastructure than some national budgets.
This inequality already affects outcomes:
A.I. models work better in English and Chinese.
Breakthroughs in medicine, automation, and defense happen where the data centers are.
Startups and scientists elsewhere are left behind—or leave entirely.
Compute has become the oil of the A.I. age. The most critical hardware—GPUs—is dominated by Nvidia, with production centralized in a few countries. Access is costly and highly competitive.
This has led to:
Brain drain in countries like Argentina and Kenya.
Dependency on foreign infrastructure, often from U.S. or Chinese providers.
A scramble by governments to secure A.I. chips and cloud access through diplomacy, trade deals, or investment incentives.
The U.S. and China are turning compute access into influence:
The U.S. restricts chip exports, choosing which nations can participate.
China offers state-backed loans and Huawei equipment in return for infrastructure loyalty.
In the Middle East and Southeast Asia, both powers are racing to dominate A.I. deployments.
Even U.S. allies, like Kenya, find themselves excluded from key deals, opening doors for Chinese companies to step in with lower-cost alternatives.
Alarmed, many nations are trying to build sovereign A.I. capabilities:
India is funding multilingual A.I. and subsidizing compute access.
Brazil pledged $4 billion for national A.I. initiatives.
Africa is exploring regional compute hubs.
Countries are offering land, cheap power, and fast-track permits to attract A.I. investments.
Brazil’s president summed it up:
“Why wait for A.I. from China or the U.S. when we can build our own?”
This is no longer just a tech competition—it’s about who shapes the future.
“We have a computing divide at the heart of the A.I. revolution,” says Lacina Koné of Smart Africa.
“It’s not merely a hardware problem. It’s the sovereignty of our digital future.”
The global A.I. divide isn’t about who’s online—it’s about who holds the power to compute, create, and control the next generation of technology. Closing this gap may determine which nations lead and which ones follow in the A.I. century.
Leave a Comments